News

Study finds rates of nearsightedness have increased significantly with time

A study of Myopia among more than 100,000 UK Biobank adults also found changing associations with sex, ethnicity and educational level

Summary:

Changing environmental factors as well as changing gene-environment interactions could be to blame for increasing rates of myopia, also known as nearsightedness or shortsightedness.

FULL STORY

Changing environmental factors as well as changing gene-environment interactions could be to blame for increasing rates of myopia, also known as nearsightedness or shortsightedness, suggests a new study published this week in the open-access journal PLOS ONE by Jugnoo Rahi of University College London, and other members of the UK Biobank Eye and Vision Consortium.

Previous studies have pointed to an emerging “epidemic” of myopia, characterized by increased prevalence of myopia accompanied by both a shift toward starting at a younger age as well as greater severity. In the new study, researchers used data on 107,442 study participants aged 40 to 69 years of age. All participants underwent a detailed ophthalmic exam and provided socio-demographic data as well as information on their history of glasses and vision problems.

Overall, myopia frequency increased from 20.0% in the oldest group (64-69 year old’s) to 29.2% in the youngest group (age 40-45). Other trends varied based on the type of myopia, with a greater increase in adult-onset myopia compared to childhood-onset myopia, and a greater increase in low myopia compared to high myopia. Moreover, the average spherical equivalent — a measure of myopia severity — worsened between groups, but only for childhood-onset myopia, shifting from a average of -3.8 diopters in the oldest participants, to -4.4 in the youngest.

Among the trends, there were additional, notable differences with relation to sex, ethnicity, socioeconomic status and education. In particular, the association between higher educational attainment and myopia increased over time, from an adjusted odds ratio of 2.7 in the oldest group (95% -2.9) to an odds ratio of 4.2 in the youngest group (95% -5.2) with the greatest increase seen in childhood-onset myopia (from -4.0 to -13).

The study authors conclude that their evidence supports changing environmental factors and presumably, changing gene-environment interactions, (discernible only by distinguishing between childhood-onset and adult-onset myopia) with increasing myopia frequency.

The authors add: “Myopia is a priority of the World Health Organization’s global initiative to reduce the burden of sight impairment. We investigated environmental risk factors driving the ‘epidemic’ of increasing frequency and severity of myopia in the UK by analyzing group effects within the UK Biobank Study. Our findings suggest that the frequency of childhood-onset myopia and of high (severe) myopia will continue to increase if rising educational experience or intensity in childhood is not addressed.”

Story Source:

Materials provided by PLOS.

D G

Recent Posts

Your Screen Is Winning. Fight Back with Office Lenses

Computer and office lenses aren't just for desks. If you wear progressives and work for…

2 days ago

The Truth About Blue Light Filters: What Science Actually Says

Let's start with an uncomfortable truth for an optical guy to admit: the blue light…

1 week ago

Will I Still Need Glasses After Cataract Surgery?

A question many patients have asked, usually while leaning forward like they're sharing a secret:…

1 week ago

Could a Vision Issue Masquerade as a Behavioral Problem?

Here's the thing—your kid's teacher says they seem "distracted." Your spouse thinks they're just not…

2 weeks ago

Astigmatism vs Normal Vision: What’s Actually Blurry?

August is Children's Eye Health and Safety Month. For Mid-Michigan families, it's also the calm…

2 weeks ago

Children’s Eye Health Month Ends When School Starts — Don’t Miss It

August is Children's Eye Health and Safety Month. For Mid-Michigan families, it's also the calm…

1 month ago